Lawmakers of almost every state are working quickly to pass the legislation regarding the legalization of cannabis. Efforts of some lawmakers resulted in the passing and implementation of marijuana legalization and decriminalization bill.
In Mexico, marijuana was a prohibited drug until the Supreme Court step in and legalized cannabis nationally. Lawmakers did get the right to change policies involving cannabis sales and other activities. However, the legislatures were unable to design or change those policies by the deadline given by the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Orders To Lift Cannabis Prohibition
The Supreme Court of Mexico ordered to deem the prohibition on personal marijuana possession and cultivation back in October 2018. According to the order, lawmakers were to change the constitution.
However, lawmakers were unable to make necessary constitutional changes. During the time, they were discussing the legalization and decriminalization of cannabis. Thus, even after almost three years, they are yet to approve a final bill.
Are Legislators Avoiding Their Duty?
Legislators are responsible or have the duty to present, discuss, and formulate legislation. Moreover, they must make any necessary changes that can arise over time.
Constitution designing, approval, and passing it in the upper and lower house are the duties of lawmakers. To formulate or approve a constitution timely is in the best interest of everyone. But the lawmakers in Mexico have been delaying the constitutional changes that could have saved many from undesirable effects.
If the prohibition had been deemed as per the Court order, many individuals may not have been behind bars. Delay in resolving matters cause complications and additional burden. Thus, lawmakers must work promptly.
Supreme Court Stepping In Constitutional Matters
According to advocates, the Supreme Court is stepping into constitutional matters. Doing so absolves legislators of their responsibility. Lawmakers have the responsibility to formulate a program regarding recreational cannabis production and sales.
On Tuesday, PorLaPaz in a press release said that the action Supreme Court is taking will increase the responsibility of the legislative branch. Moreover, it is essential to continue legislative processes.
To overturn the prohibition of cannabis, eight ministers on the Supreme Court will have to vote in favor of the declaration of unconstitutionality passing. Doing so seems to be an abrupt decision.
The Court in October 2018, gave a deadline of one year to legislators to overturn prohibition. But as the lawmakers were unable to do so, they request the Supreme Court to extend the deadline. After approving the request of lawmakers, the deadline extended to April 2020, then December 2020, and finally April 30, 2021.
Lawmakers on one end were extending the deadline, and on the other end were working yet were unable to solve the matter till April 30, 2021. Drafting is almost complete, and legislators were advancing towards legislation that legalizes cannabis.
During the latest session, things were going pretty well. Last year Senate approved the bill after some revisions Chamber of Duties passed it in March. Then it was sent back to originating chambers. Few Senate committees cleared amended measures. However, during that time leaders, begin to say due to some revisions proposal is unworkable.
Ricardo Monreal Avila is the Senate Majority Leader. According to Avila, if the Court declares unconstitutionality before approving a program or measure to regulate cannabis, it will lead to a chaotic situation.
Some legislators agree with court interference, while others desire to continue their work without any pressure. Top senators are not in favor of rushing matters. Moreover, they appreciate that lawmakers are taking their time to design an efficient policy. To design a plan free from mistakes over some time is better than making a plan with multiple errors that can complicate cannabis activities.
Originally covered on: Marijuanamovement
Recycling Of Tonnes Of Cannabis Containers
Cannabis products formulations in solid, liquid, and smoke-able forms are available in the market for medical and recreational use. Marijuana products are kept under storage conditions set out by the manufacturer.
Cannabis products come in containers of variable sizes and shapes. The material used to prepare containers depends upon the manufacturer’s choice and demand for the stability of marijuana products.
Recycling of containers is occurring for decades to reuse items or process used items into new ones. Doing so reduces pollution and helps to use one material multiple times.
Returning And Recycling Of Cannabis Containers To SDQC
In less than 12 months, about 21 tonnes of empty plastic containers were sent to recycle to the SQDC. SQDC is the company that does the recycling under the name Societe Quebecoise du cannabis. It is a government-owned company.
The company began its recycling package or recovery program in August 2020. Since August, a lot of plastic containers have gone through recovery programs, precisely 2291143 containers.
The use of cannabis products has hugely increased in the market. The number of marijuana containers purchased by consumers is likely to be much more than the number of containers send to SQDC to recycle. There is only a deposit on SQDC beverages included in the RECYCQUEBEC consignment system.
However, there is no deposit on the SQDC containers in the system. Quebecers who do return pot containers do so not for money as they do not get money. They do so to keep containers away from trash.
According to the SDQC, the benefit of returning empty containers is that others materials cannot contaminate cannabis containers. Moreover, doing so ensures that these packaging materials do not end up in the blue boxes. Collecting these empty plastic packaging allows sending a uniform material to businesses that reuse it easily after quick processing.
What Happens To Marijuana Containers After Recycling
The Societe Quebecoise du cannabis signed a partnership with TerraCycle. TerraCycle is a U.S.-based recycling business company. The SQDC sends collected cannabis containers to TerraCycle and other such companies that are in agreement to recycle them.
TerraCycle recycling business company focuses on using the used items to form urban furniture such as park benches, flower boxes, etc. According to some individuals, TerraCycle recycles bags that could have added to pollution or result in a landfill otherwise.
According to the Canadian press, it is uncertain what happens to those containers. It is also unclear how many of such packagings go into and out of the company. No one knows the exact number of plastic packaging required to produce urban furniture. Furthermore, there is little knowledge about other formulations that use this recyclable material. So far, there is no way to find it as the TerraCycle recycling business company does not respond to emails or phone calls as per the Canadian press.
The SQDC, in a Facebook post on a page, announces that they will continue to work to improve the environment. They are working with a team of experts to develop an efficient action plan for cannabis containers and packaging recycling that is eco-friendlier. They are looking forward to going further with their environmental efforts.
Some people are criticizing SDQC for its products that are considered over-packaged or are environmentally unsustainable. Individuals complain that they have to wait in line to return the cannabis containers, and it would be much better if SQDC places outdoor bins in front of SQDC branches. Some individuals, while returning multiple marijuana containers, feel embarrassed.
SQDC replied to these complaints and said that they are aware of the critical remarks. However, they cannot do much about it as they are to abide by the law. Placing outdoor bins cannot ensure control over the material. Outdoor recycling bins can increase the risk of accidental cannabis consumption in children and youth.
Pot Legal In NYC But Where To Buy Recreational Cannabis In New York
Pot products, including recreational cannabis and medical marijuana products, are legal in New York. The lawmakers have successfully approved the weed legalization and decriminalization bill. However, the administration working and policies to implement the bill is taking way too much time.
The disagreements among legislators and the inability to develop a plan to implement the legislation delays implementation of the new bill. Due to delays in proceeding procedures, things have become difficult for almost everyone.
Cannabis Legalization Program Of New York – A Train To Nowhere
Governor Andrew Cuomo and state legislatures did approve cannabis legalization and decriminalization bill in March this year. However, there has not been much progress. According to critics, the Governor is the real buzzkill on the issue.
Critics elaborate that Cuomo is yet to nominate an executive director for his new Office of Cannabis Management. He also has to name appointees to the Cannabis Control Board. The Marijuana Taxation and Regulation Act were passed months ago, yet the official is working slowly to appoint and name some people for the office to begin further proceedings.
The Governor is delaying the procedure because the Senate members have not yet passed Cuomo’s proposed MTA legislation. Richard Azzopardi is the spokesperson of Gov. Andrew Cuomo. According to his spokesperson, there are multiple unfinished businesses in Senate. However, they will submit their nominees and names for designated positions. The spokesperson also mentioned that they hope Senate passes MTA legislation and let nominees selected by the governor implement order regarding cannabis.
Politicians Against Delay In Implementation Of Cannabis Legalization Policy In New York
Mike Murphy is the spokesman for Senate Leader Andrea Stewart Cousins. According to Murphy, MTA approval and nominating nominees are separate issues with no interlinkage. Thus, these matters need separate resolutions, and it is best not to try to relate them.
According to State Senator Diane Savino, after observing the current situation, it is evident that the cannabis legalistic program is likely to delay for much a longer time. She added that the public and officials of New York are in between a rock and a solid hard place.
Moreover, apart from the politicians, the public is angry and frustrated at the delay of matters. Residents of the state are unable to understand the logic or reasoning behind the pending situation.
According to Diane Savino, legislatures or lawmakers should walk and sign a joint agreement at the time regarding the subject to settle things as quickly as possible.
The politician further added that nothing can happen concerning marijuana sale policy and license issuance to begin a legal business. At least until regulators develop a set of ground rules to conduct cannabis business, following legal practices is impossible.
What Is More About Marijuana Policy In New York State?
According to Diane Savino, no operation involving marijuana is practicable unless legislators set some ground rules. Licenses to individuals to begin a legal sale, cultivation, processing, manufacturing, or distribution of marijuana is unapprovable before settling some limitations. Moreover, it is inappropriate to approve licenses without designing a regulatory system.
ALSO READ: Cannabis Dealer Stopped By Police
Governor needs to select three people to begin the formation of the five-member Cannabis Control Board. The nominees will first get approval from the Senate to offer their services. The selection of the other two members falls on the legislatures. One member of the five-member committee will be selected by lawmakers from the Assembly and one from the Senate.
The selection of nominees and their approval is the next step after passing the bill, and it took almost a year for completion. Delaying the process cause trouble for the state and the public who had to go to borders to purchase cannabis legally from neighboring states like Massachusetts.
Unless the regulatory and administrative procedures are incomplete, the state is unable to generate revenue. Pending them will only slow down the development process of the cannabis business field and delay experiencing possible benefits from its tax revenue.
Originally covered on: NYPost
Cannabis Products Association With Perceived Risks And Availability
Cannabis products are in use for medical and recreational purposes in more than thirty states of the United States. Some of these states allow medical marijuana products, while others allow pot for all purposes, including adult and medical purposes.
Multiple studies have been conducted relating to cannabis, including pot effects and associations with other factors. Perceived risks and availability links with marijuana use disorders. Moreover, research findings can demonstrate how perceived risks can alter pot use disorders in individuals.
According to a new study at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, perceptions of the risks and availability of cannabis influence the risk of pot use. This influence is more than the perceived risk and effect of perceived availability alone.
The research discovers that individuals that perceive cannabis as a low-risk and available drug are more likely to use cannabis. There are some other findings too. Researchers discovered that individuals with perceptions that cannabis is high-risk and unavailable drug report fewer drug use cases. You can find research discoveries in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence.
More About Research Regarding Perceived Risks And Availability Effects On Cannabis Use
Natalie Levy is a Doctoral Student of the Department of Epidemiology at Columbia Mailman School and the first author of the study. According to this research, perception of cannabis risk affects its use, frequency of use, and pot use disorders. Moreover, the availability of cannabis does influence the chances of drug use, its frequency, and marijuana use disorders.
However, the findings show that cannabis risks and availability together influence pot use more frequently. The research focused on the evolution of collective perceptions of marijuana risk and availability from 2002 to 2018.
Data of 949,285 participants helped in doing the investigation or survey studies. These participants are from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. Researchers found that over the years from 2002 to 2018, more people perceive marijuana as a low-risk drug. The prevalence of individuals who perceive pot as a low-risk drug doubled in these years. However, the influence of the change in availability perception was comparatively less evident.
The joined perceptions influence was evident in these years. The percentage of individuals with the perception of cannabis as low-risk and available increased from 17% to 36% from 2002 to 2018, respectively. The number of individuals who perceive marijuana as a high-risk and available or unavailable drug decreases in these years. The percentage of people who perceive pot as high-risk and available is 26 percent. Meanwhile, the percentage of individuals that consider weed as high-risk and unavailable is twenty-seven percent.
Marijuana Perception Effects
According to findings, individuals who regard cannabis as low-risk have reported and are likely to report six times more about pot use. Individuals with the perception of cannabis being available are five times more likely to use pot.
However, joined perceptions increase the chances of pot use. Individuals with joined perceptions are twenty-two times more likely to use marijuana. That is, people who perceive cannabis as a low-risk and available drug are more than 22 times more likely to use pot than people with the opposite perception.
Marijuana perceptions vary from males to females. A large percentage of the male population views marijuana as a low-risk, more available drug when compared to females. Researchers noted variations in pot perceptions in different age groups of each gender. According to the study, individuals of age 12-17 years show minimal cannabis perception differences.
Silvia Martins, MD, Ph.D., is an associate professor of epidemiology at the Columbia Mailman School. She is the director of the Substance Use Epidemiology Unit of the Department of Epidemiology. She is also the senior author of the study. According to Martins, their research will open a new pathway for searching specific hypotheses. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of exploring joint perceived risks and availability on cannabis use.
Originally covered on: news-medical
Cannabis2 years ago
How CBD oil works?
Cannabis2 years ago
Research Suggests Cannabis Effective in Treating Endometriosis
Health2 years ago
Diabetes Freedom Review – A Natural Way To Beat Diabetes Type 2
Cannabis2 years ago
CBD Gummies: How does it work? Benefits, Pricing and Packages
Featured2 years ago
Prosper Wellness TurmeriCBD Review – A combination of Turmeric and CBD?
Health2 years ago
VitaMove, a Popular Formula to Relieve Back Pain is Restocked
Cannabis2 years ago
What are the main advantages of consuming CBD oil?
Cannabis2 years ago
Can Cannabis Survive in Pharma?